Login




oder neu registrieren?


Suche

Suchen Sie im kath.net Archiv in über 70000 Artikeln:







Top-15

meist-diskutiert

  1. Basiert 'Traditionis Custodes' von Franziskus auf einer Lüge?
  2. Vatikan führt neue Umweltschutz-Messe ein
  3. Vatikan reagiert auf 'Alte Messe'-Skandal von Franziskus
  4. Anselmianum distanziert sich vom Hauptautor von ‚Traditionis Custodes‘
  5. Präfekt Fernandez behauptete offenbar: Fiducia supplicans „wird bleiben“
  6. Vatikanstaat will bis 2030 komplett auf Elektroautos umsteigen
  7. Priestermangel: Bischof hebt Sonntagspflicht teilweise auf
  8. „Dieser Erwählung und Berufung könnt ihr nur mit der bedingungslosen Bereitschaft entsprechen…“
  9. Syrer schlug Küster mit 1,6 Meter langem Kruzifix nieder
  10. Immer wenn es wärmer wird und Sommer ist, dann sind die 'apokalyptischen Klimareiter' ganz nahe
  11. Fällt die CDU erneut um?
  12. Deutsches Bildungs- und Familienministerium schafft Gender-Sternchen und großes Binnen-I ab!
  13. Deutsche Bischöfe stoppen kirchenfinanziertes Queerpapier
  14. Kardinal Zen: Jesus Christus „hat uns Papst Leo XIV. geschenkt, der den Sturm beruhigen kann“
  15. Großbritannien - Priester kündigt an, er wird Pro-Sterbehilfe-Politiker die Kommunion verweigern

Peter and Judas

9. März 2011 in English, keine Lesermeinung
Druckansicht | Artikel versenden | Tippfehler melden


Of Trust in the Mercy and Forgiveness of God. By Fr. Bernhard Speringer and Jennifer Hartline


Goldlach (kath.net)

PETER’S DENIAL

Reading the Passion of Christ we tend to notice one thing: the significance that the evangelists give the denial of Christ by St. Peter, the first apostle, our first pope. The gospel of Mark especially lends great importance to this denial. It is reported - much to the shame of St. Peter - in great detail.

We know that the Evangelist Mark became some kind of “secretary” to Peter in Rome later on. His gospel rests primarily on statements and witness accounts of Peter. Peter, himself, spread the story of his denial. He made it known to everyone, and his sermons became a kind of “public confession”.

Why?

Perhaps Peter wanted to give hope to all those who like him betrayed and denied Our Lord. Perhaps, he wanted to tell all those who would also fall like him about the forgiveness he received and say:

• No sin is so grave that Our Lord could not forgive it;
• No betrayal of God can be so great that the God’s mercy could not be greater
• No denial can be so shameful and humiliating that we should despair over it.

And when Peter says this, it is not an empty phrase but his very own experience of God’s mercy. At the Last Supper Jesus predicted that Peter would deny Him three times, and Peter boasted: “And if I were to die with you - I will never deny you.”

But several hours later - after Jesus had been arrested - this cocky announcement turned into a three-fold betrayal: “I don’t know this person....”

PETER AND JUDAS

In the Passion according to St. Mark we notice something else: the parallel between Judas and Peter.

The Gospel tells us what happened after the denial of Peter: “The Lord turned and looked at Peter. ..... And he went out and wept bitterly.” (Lk. 22:61)


Not only did Jesus predict His denial by Peter but also His betrayal by Judas. He did not just look at Judas, but even kissed him. Judas left and hanged himself. (Mt. 27:5)

Superficially, Peter and Judas have the same fate. Both betrayed Our Lord, both recognized their own guilt and felt remorse, both received Jesus’ love even after the betrayal: A look. A kiss. Where is the difference? Why do we have such dramatically different endings given the seemingly equal fate of both apostles?

The difference lies in this only: Peter trusted in God’s mercy - Judas did not.

REAL CONTRITION INSTEAD OF SELF-PITY

Betraying Jesus wasn’t the worst that Judas did. As despicable as this act was, it did not lead to Judas’ tragic demise. His downfall was that he had lost hope. He either did not believe in forgiveness, or he did not trust that this forgiveness would be given him; or he decided that he could not or would not forgive himself, in which case he gave himself up into hopelessness and despair.

It may seem that his despair was proof of his great sorrow over betraying his friend and master. Repentance, however, is something completely different. Repentance is always a great benefit for our soul. Real repentance leads us back, leads us to forgiveness; real repentance is a special kind of love towards the person one has betrayed.

If we are just disappointed with ourselves and our failure, this is not real repentance but simply pride. Then we are giving ourselves up in hopelessness and calling it our just punishment.

Self-pitying sorrow is not desired by Jesus. It is not proof of my love for Him when I claim apparently with contrition: “I don’t deserve to be forgiven...” or “I just cannot forgive myself....” If I cannot forgive myself it simply means that I prefer my wounded pride over His suffering Love.

TRUE HUMILITY INSTEAD OF DESPAIR

After he betrayed Jesus, Peter may have wished to die, just like Judas. For a moment it may have seemed the only way out of his guilt. The difference, however, was that Peter chose hope while Judas chose despair. Judas refused that forgiveness which he also could have received. His fate was not sealed by a kiss, but by his pride.

Every single one of his apostles left Jesus that night, denied him and betrayed him somehow. Judas’ sin, however, receives more attention because it seems more scandalous than the others. If we just focus on Judas’ greed we miss the true lesson behind it.

All the apostles let Jesus down in various ways, just as we do all the time. Somehow they all betrayed him, just as we do all the time also. Surely, they were all sad, scared and full of remorse over their sins, just as we are. But only Judas preferred his guilt over redemption. In his pride he preferred death over humbly asking for forgiveness.

That is the great lesson for our faith: How often do we wallow in self-pity and think we are really humble. Self-pity has nothing to do with humility, nor with repentance. Humility is always truth, and the truth is: we sinned. And we will sin again.

And there is only one way to make up for it, to “undo” it. We have to truly and honestly repent, humbly throw ourselves into Our Lord’s arms - in the Sacrament of Confession. Judas lacked in hope because he lacked in humility.

And Jesus takes us up into His arms. He gazes at us full of mercy, just as He gazed at Peter full of mercy. It is not important how often we fail or fall - provided we return to Him every time full of hope and humility.

TRUST IN GOD’S MERCY

Scripture reports again and again how we betray God - and how the endings are so different:
Kain killed his brother Abel, but David also murdered Uria whose wife he had an affair with.
Kain came out of this story as despicable sinner, and David as saint.

Kain fell into despair due to his sin; he thought his sin was too great for it to be forgiven. David trusted in God’s mercy and called on His forgiveness.

The same story repeats itself over and over - all the way to Golgotha: two thieves are being crucified together with Jesus. One of them curses and despairs. The other one asks forgiveness: “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” (Lk 23:42). And he receives the most beautiful promise that a man can ever receive: “Amen, I say to you: Today you will be with me in paradise.” (Ibid.)

It is one thing for God to give forgiveness and redemption, and it is another for us to accept His forgiveness and redemption, esp. through the Sacraments of Baptism, Penance and the Holy Eucharist.

And that requires humility: Peter had to learn that humility, he had to understand that he cannot give redemption and forgiveness to himself, but that Jesus’ suffering for him it is a gift of God’s mercy.

May God give us that humility also, that in the hour of death we may not despair in light of our sins, but that we may unconditionally trust in God’s mercy and throw ourselves into His loving arms.


Ihnen hat der Artikel gefallen? Bitte helfen Sie kath.net und spenden Sie jetzt via Überweisung oder Kreditkarte/Paypal!

 





Lesermeinungen

Um selbst Kommentare verfassen zu können müssen Sie sich bitte einloggen.

Für die Kommentiermöglichkeit von kath.net-Artikeln müssen Sie sich bei kathLogin registrieren. Die Kommentare werden von Moderatoren stichprobenartig überprüft und freigeschaltet. Ein Anrecht auf Freischaltung besteht nicht. Ein Kommentar ist auf 1000 Zeichen beschränkt. Die Kommentare geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung der Redaktion wieder.
kath.net verweist in dem Zusammenhang auch an das Schreiben von Papst Benedikt zum 45. Welttag der Sozialen Kommunikationsmittel und lädt die Kommentatoren dazu ein, sich daran zu orientieren: "Das Evangelium durch die neuen Medien mitzuteilen bedeutet nicht nur, ausgesprochen religiöse Inhalte auf die Plattformen der verschiedenen Medien zu setzen, sondern auch im eigenen digitalen Profil und Kommunikationsstil konsequent Zeugnis abzulegen hinsichtlich Entscheidungen, Präferenzen und Urteilen, die zutiefst mit dem Evangelium übereinstimmen, auch wenn nicht explizit davon gesprochen wird." (www.kath.net)
kath.net behält sich vor, Kommentare, welche strafrechtliche Normen verletzen, den guten Sitten widersprechen oder sonst dem Ansehen des Mediums zuwiderlaufen, zu entfernen. Die Benutzer können diesfalls keine Ansprüche stellen. Aus Zeitgründen kann über die Moderation von User-Kommentaren keine Korrespondenz geführt werden. Weiters behält sich kath.net vor, strafrechtlich relevante Tatbestände zur Anzeige zu bringen.


Mehr zu

Barmherzigkeit

  1. Die Philippinen sind das erste Land, das sich der göttlichen Barmherzigkeit geweiht hat
  2. "Herr, wie oft muss ich meinem Bruder vergeben...?"
  3. Gottes Barmherzigkeit
  4. "Held der Nächstenliebe": Bub starb nach Corona-Pflege der Mutter
  5. Barmherzigkeitssonntag
  6. Hab Erbarmen mit uns und mit der ganzen Welt
  7. Die Quelle der Göttlichen Barmherzigkeit
  8. Gottes Erbarmen kennt keine Grenzen
  9. Die grenzenlose Barmherzigkeit Gottes
  10. Papst veröffentlicht am Montag neues Apostolisches Schreiben






Top-15

meist-gelesen

  1. Basiert 'Traditionis Custodes' von Franziskus auf einer Lüge?
  2. Anselmianum distanziert sich vom Hauptautor von ‚Traditionis Custodes‘
  3. Vatikan reagiert auf 'Alte Messe'-Skandal von Franziskus
  4. Kardinal Zen: Jesus Christus „hat uns Papst Leo XIV. geschenkt, der den Sturm beruhigen kann“
  5. „Dieser Erwählung und Berufung könnt ihr nur mit der bedingungslosen Bereitschaft entsprechen…“
  6. Deutsches Bildungs- und Familienministerium schafft Gender-Sternchen und großes Binnen-I ab!
  7. Kard. Ambongo: Widerstand gegen Segnungen gleichgeschlechtlicher Paare keine "afrikanische Ausnahme"
  8. Präfekt Fernandez behauptete offenbar: Fiducia supplicans „wird bleiben“
  9. Vatikan führt neue Umweltschutz-Messe ein
  10. Kirchensteuer – die wunderbare Geldvermehrung
  11. Sogar die publizistische 'Links-Plattform' der DBK hat genug vom 'Alte Messe'-Bashing von Franziskus
  12. Fällt die CDU erneut um?
  13. Papst Leo XIV. und die Herz-Jesu-Verehrung
  14. Blair und Brooke und ihre Rosenkränze
  15. Syrer schlug Küster mit 1,6 Meter langem Kruzifix nieder

© 2025 kath.net | Impressum | Datenschutz